[Scons-dev] Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github

[Daniel Moody]

What about this:

     --interval-start FLOAT   Percentile as float (0.0 - 1.0) of what test
to start on from the
                                           determined list of all tests
     --interval-end FLOAT     Percentile as float (0.0 - 1.0) of what test
to start on from the
                                           determined list of all tests

interval-start default is 0
interval-end default is 1

A little more flexible I think.



On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:

> Maybe add a flag directly to runtest.py to split up the tests.
> --test_mod 4 --test_index 0..3 ?
>
> Or something to that affect.
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Daniel Moody <dmoody256 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Andrew,
>>
>> I also was working on this. I think in your case the builds timed out due
>> to issues with vswhere:
>> https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/87
>> https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/91
>>
>> In this case we will need to use the Visual Studio 2017 image.
>>
>> Also just to note; the issue mentioned above is also an issue with SCons
>> MSVS detection in general now for SCons 3 and newer since that is when it
>> was switched to use vswhere.
>>
>> I liked some of the things you had in your script so I took those and
>> merge them into my script. I also implemented a script that will split the
>> build up into multiple jobs like the travis script does, however I have not
>> been able to get appveyor to do multi-line scripts correctly so it is all
>> in a one liner at the moment:
>> https://github.com/dmoody256/scons/blob/AppveyorCI/.appveyor.yml
>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/dmoody256/scons/build/1.0.53
>>
>> Currently python 3 will fail from several tests so I have them commented
>> out.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Parallel should help.
>>>
>>> On my buildbot worker (with 2 other builds running single threaded
>>> tests) it takes 2:05.
>>> So on a reasonably modern machine, -j2 should finish in under an hour if
>>> not, try -j3?
>>>
>>> Or we can split up runs as we've done with the travis run..
>>>
>>> -Bill
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Andrew Featherstone <
>>> andrew.featherstone at cantab.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been trying to get AppVeyor working for Windows-based CI, but
>>>> we're hitting their 1 hour time limit (see
>>>> https://github.com/ajf58/scons/blob/appveyor/.appveyor.yml and
>>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ajf58/scons.
>>>>
>>>> My next pass at this will be trying to run the unit tests in parallel
>>>> (as the Windows VM has two cores available). Either that, or we split the
>>>> job matrix a different way, e.g. run tests grouped by something else other
>>>> than Python version.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>> On 18 December 2017 at 22:51, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Daniel,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we get travis to test with py2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Bill
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> That's pretty cool.
>>>>>> I'll try to get the coverage hooked up soon.
>>>>>> That'll also be very useful..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Jonathon Reinhart <
>>>>>> jonathon.reinhart at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, it should automatically do that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See this (merged) PR from one of my projects:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/JonathonReinhart/scuba/pull/98
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Towards the bottom you'll see a "View Details" button.
>>>>>>> Clicking that will expand a box showing the results of all the
>>>>>>> "checks" that ran.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there a way to get travis to post the results back into the pull
>>>>>>>> request?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20171220/8860e1ff/attachment-0001.html>