[Scons-dev] Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github

[Bill Deegan]

Maybe add a flag directly to runtest.py to split up the tests.
--test_mod 4 --test_index 0..3 ?

Or something to that affect.

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Daniel Moody <dmoody256 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Andrew,
>
> I also was working on this. I think in your case the builds timed out due
> to issues with vswhere:
> https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/87
> https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/91
>
> In this case we will need to use the Visual Studio 2017 image.
>
> Also just to note; the issue mentioned above is also an issue with SCons
> MSVS detection in general now for SCons 3 and newer since that is when it
> was switched to use vswhere.
>
> I liked some of the things you had in your script so I took those and
> merge them into my script. I also implemented a script that will split the
> build up into multiple jobs like the travis script does, however I have not
> been able to get appveyor to do multi-line scripts correctly so it is all
> in a one liner at the moment:
> https://github.com/dmoody256/scons/blob/AppveyorCI/.appveyor.yml
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/dmoody256/scons/build/1.0.53
>
> Currently python 3 will fail from several tests so I have them commented
> out.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Parallel should help.
>>
>> On my buildbot worker (with 2 other builds running single threaded tests)
>> it takes 2:05.
>> So on a reasonably modern machine, -j2 should finish in under an hour if
>> not, try -j3?
>>
>> Or we can split up runs as we've done with the travis run..
>>
>> -Bill
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Andrew Featherstone <
>> andrew.featherstone at cantab.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been trying to get AppVeyor working for Windows-based CI, but we're
>>> hitting their 1 hour time limit (see https://github.com/ajf58/scons
>>> /blob/appveyor/.appveyor.yml and https://ci.appveyor.com/projec
>>> t/ajf58/scons.
>>>
>>> My next pass at this will be trying to run the unit tests in parallel
>>> (as the Windows VM has two cores available). Either that, or we split the
>>> job matrix a different way, e.g. run tests grouped by something else other
>>> than Python version.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> On 18 December 2017 at 22:51, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> Can we get travis to test with py2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 ?
>>>>
>>>> -Bill
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> That's pretty cool.
>>>>> I'll try to get the coverage hooked up soon.
>>>>> That'll also be very useful..
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Jonathon Reinhart <
>>>>> jonathon.reinhart at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it should automatically do that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See this (merged) PR from one of my projects:
>>>>>> https://github.com/JonathonReinhart/scuba/pull/98
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Towards the bottom you'll see a "View Details" button.
>>>>>> Clicking that will expand a box showing the results of all the
>>>>>> "checks" that ran.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there a way to get travis to post the results back into the pull
>>>>>>> request?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20171220/40a43248/attachment.html>