[Scons-dev] Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github

[Daniel Moody]

Hey Andrew,

I also was working on this. I think in your case the builds timed out due
to issues with vswhere:
https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/87
https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/91

In this case we will need to use the Visual Studio 2017 image.

Also just to note; the issue mentioned above is also an issue with SCons
MSVS detection in general now for SCons 3 and newer since that is when it
was switched to use vswhere.

I liked some of the things you had in your script so I took those and merge
them into my script. I also implemented a script that will split the build
up into multiple jobs like the travis script does, however I have not been
able to get appveyor to do multi-line scripts correctly so it is all in a
one liner at the moment:
https://github.com/dmoody256/scons/blob/AppveyorCI/.appveyor.yml
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/dmoody256/scons/build/1.0.53

Currently python 3 will fail from several tests so I have them commented
out.


On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:

> Parallel should help.
>
> On my buildbot worker (with 2 other builds running single threaded tests)
> it takes 2:05.
> So on a reasonably modern machine, -j2 should finish in under an hour if
> not, try -j3?
>
> Or we can split up runs as we've done with the travis run..
>
> -Bill
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Andrew Featherstone <
> andrew.featherstone at cantab.net> wrote:
>
>> I've been trying to get AppVeyor working for Windows-based CI, but we're
>> hitting their 1 hour time limit (see https://github.com/ajf58/scons
>> /blob/appveyor/.appveyor.yml and https://ci.appveyor.com/projec
>> t/ajf58/scons.
>>
>> My next pass at this will be trying to run the unit tests in parallel (as
>> the Windows VM has two cores available). Either that, or we split the job
>> matrix a different way, e.g. run tests grouped by something else other than
>> Python version.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On 18 December 2017 at 22:51, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel,
>>>
>>> Can we get travis to test with py2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 ?
>>>
>>> -Bill
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> That's pretty cool.
>>>> I'll try to get the coverage hooked up soon.
>>>> That'll also be very useful..
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Jonathon Reinhart <
>>>> jonathon.reinhart at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it should automatically do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> See this (merged) PR from one of my projects:
>>>>> https://github.com/JonathonReinhart/scuba/pull/98
>>>>>
>>>>> Towards the bottom you'll see a "View Details" button.
>>>>> Clicking that will expand a box showing the results of all the
>>>>> "checks" that ran.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a way to get travis to post the results back into the pull
>>>>>> request?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20171220/864a18f8/attachment-0001.html>