[Scons-dev] Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github

Wed Dec 20 10:26:48 EST 2017

Sounds good. Just need to ensure that splitting in quarters doesn't either
drop one or run one test twice because of rounding..

-Bill

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Daniel Moody <dmoody256 at gmail.com> wrote:

> What about this:
>
>      --interval-start FLOAT   Percentile as float (0.0 - 1.0) of what test
> to start on from the
>                                            determined list of all tests
>      --interval-end FLOAT     Percentile as float (0.0 - 1.0) of what test
> to start on from the
>                                            determined list of all tests
>
> interval-start default is 0
> interval-end default is 1
>
> A little more flexible I think.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe add a flag directly to runtest.py to split up the tests.
>> --test_mod 4 --test_index 0..3 ?
>>
>> Or something to that affect.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Daniel Moody <dmoody256 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Andrew,
>>>
>>> I also was working on this. I think in your case the builds timed out
>>> due to issues with vswhere:
>>> https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/87
>>> https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/91
>>>
>>> In this case we will need to use the Visual Studio 2017 image.
>>>
>>> Also just to note; the issue mentioned above is also an issue with SCons
>>> MSVS detection in general now for SCons 3 and newer since that is when it
>>> was switched to use vswhere.
>>>
>>> I liked some of the things you had in your script so I took those and
>>> merge them into my script. I also implemented a script that will split the
>>> build up into multiple jobs like the travis script does, however I have not
>>> been able to get appveyor to do multi-line scripts correctly so it is all
>>> in a one liner at the moment:
>>> https://github.com/dmoody256/scons/blob/AppveyorCI/.appveyor.yml
>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/dmoody256/scons/build/1.0.53
>>>
>>> Currently python 3 will fail from several tests so I have them commented
>>> out.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Parallel should help.
>>>>
>>>> On my buildbot worker (with 2 other builds running single threaded
>>>> tests) it takes 2:05.
>>>> So on a reasonably modern machine, -j2 should finish in under an hour
>>>> if not, try -j3?
>>>>
>>>> Or we can split up runs as we've done with the travis run..
>>>>
>>>> -Bill
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Andrew Featherstone <
>>>> andrew.featherstone at cantab.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've been trying to get AppVeyor working for Windows-based CI, but
>>>>> we're hitting their 1 hour time limit (see
>>>>> https://github.com/ajf58/scons/blob/appveyor/.appveyor.yml and
>>>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ajf58/scons.
>>>>>
>>>>> My next pass at this will be trying to run the unit tests in parallel
>>>>> (as the Windows VM has two cores available). Either that, or we split the
>>>>> job matrix a different way, e.g. run tests grouped by something else other
>>>>> than Python version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18 December 2017 at 22:51, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we get travis to test with py2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Bill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> That's pretty cool.
>>>>>>> I'll try to get the coverage hooked up soon.
>>>>>>> That'll also be very useful..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Jonathon Reinhart <
>>>>>>> jonathon.reinhart at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, it should automatically do that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See this (merged) PR from one of my projects:
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/JonathonReinhart/scuba/pull/98
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Towards the bottom you'll see a "View Details" button.
>>>>>>>> Clicking that will expand a box showing the results of all the
>>>>>>>> "checks" that ran.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to get travis to post the results back into the
>>>>>>>>> pull request?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20171220/4c640eda/attachment.html>