[Scons-dev] Formal proposal

William Deegan bill at baddogconsulting.com
Sat Feb 9 17:34:18 EST 2013


I'd vote for 2.7 if we're moving forward.

Gary - will it be an issue moving any of the platforms u need to 2.7? (SGI?)

_Bill
On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:26 AM, "Kenny, Jason L" <jason.l.kenny at intel.com> wrote:


> Why don’t we agree to move to 2.6 at the very least. We can always move up to 2.7 later if this proves to be better.

>

> From my point of view the only reason 2.7 is better is that some libraries are back ported better here, than 2.6. This however is only an issue if we use them, and only if there is no workaround.

>

> Jason

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20130209/5d871ce5/attachment.html>


More information about the Scons-dev mailing list