[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3.0
info at fibrecode.com
info at fibrecode.com
Wed Feb 25 15:28:46 EST 2015
Question,
what's going on on python3-port at all. Is it still active?
On https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/branch/python3-port last entry is April
2014.
I like scons and I like python3. I'm not sure, if people really need both
versions forever.
I installed python2.7 just for scons, and many people are moving forward to
use python3 only.
Why not put python2.7 in stable branch for maintenance only, and just work
on python3 in trunk.
Best regards,
Rainer
-----Original Message-----
From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-bounces at scons.org] On Behalf Of Dirk
Bächle
Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015 21:10
To: scons-dev at scons.org
Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3.0
Bill,
On 25.02.2015 20:29, Bill Deegan wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I believe the goal should be that a single codebase would work on
> python 2.7 and 3.x
>
> Given that premise I think having a separate branch for 3.0 work would
just end up in much additional work.
>
you're aware of the fact that we already have a branch for this
(python3-port)?
> I'd like to add some python 3.0 buildslaves and then add small changes
> to trunk which would work towards the goal of the code working on py 2.7
and 3.x.
>
> Otherwise we'll have to maintain a longstanding branch for 3.0 work.
> Since it's unlikely that such changes will be huge architectural
> changes, but mainly should be minor code changes this should be a
relatively safe path..
>
> Thoughts?
>
At some point after the v2.5 release, we should probably just merge the
current "python3-port" into "default"...and then put all our efforts into
making it work. From then on it's a mixed 2.7/3.x codebase...and we don't
look back.
Just my 2 cents,
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev at scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list