[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

[William Blevins]

+1 for just merging the patch

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:

> Dirk,
>
> I think we've given enough notice that pre 2.7 is going to be dropped.
> I'll take a pass through the updated pull request (#284) and merge it,
> unless someone has serious issues with doing so.
>
> -Bill
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On 11.12.2015 22:39, Bill Deegan wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on waiting for Dirks pull request to land.
>>> He has a couple items to add before it's complete.
>>> He said he'll be working on them over the weekend.
>>> Might be done by Tuesday..
>>>
>>>
>> I've updated my pull request with an additional commit. So, short of a
>> final review, it should be ready to get merged...
>>
>> I'd like to raise one question though: What about the integration of the
>> "stubprocess.py" wrapper? Wasn't this planned for the next release 2.5? If
>> we want to keep it this way, it might be better to *not* merge my PR into
>> "trunk" right now, but only onto the python3 branch directly.
>> Like this, we could work on the "stubprocess" thingy, merge it to "trunk"
>> first, and only then put PR#284 on top. This would give us the opportunity
>> to release a 2.5 with the "stubprocess.py" speedup, but still (some)
>> backward compatibility to Python 2.6...so more users could benefit from
>> this?
>>
>> Just as an idea...
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20151215/3f068e19/attachment.html>