[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Bill Deegan bill at baddogconsulting.com
Mon Dec 14 22:36:47 EST 2015


Dirk,

I think we've given enough notice that pre 2.7 is going to be dropped.
I'll take a pass through the updated pull request (#284) and merge it,
unless someone has serious issues with doing so.

-Bill


On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> On 11.12.2015 22:39, Bill Deegan wrote:
>
>> +1 on waiting for Dirks pull request to land.
>> He has a couple items to add before it's complete.
>> He said he'll be working on them over the weekend.
>> Might be done by Tuesday..
>>
>>
> I've updated my pull request with an additional commit. So, short of a
> final review, it should be ready to get merged...
>
> I'd like to raise one question though: What about the integration of the
> "stubprocess.py" wrapper? Wasn't this planned for the next release 2.5? If
> we want to keep it this way, it might be better to *not* merge my PR into
> "trunk" right now, but only onto the python3 branch directly.
> Like this, we could work on the "stubprocess" thingy, merge it to "trunk"
> first, and only then put PR#284 on top. This would give us the opportunity
> to release a 2.5 with the "stubprocess.py" speedup, but still (some)
> backward compatibility to Python 2.6...so more users could benefit from
> this?
>
> Just as an idea...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dirk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20151214/087e2b30/attachment.html>


More information about the Scons-dev mailing list