[Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

[William Blevins]

Would it be wise to try something like changing that line to a build with
"--explain", so we might be able to figure out why SCons thinks its out of
date?

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:18 AM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I almost wonder whether its related to the Ubuntu rpmbuild setup, since
> rpmbuild is native to the RHEL (fedora, CentOS) systems, but Ubunut
> (Debian, etc) use apt and dpkg.
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> William,
>>
>> On 07.08.2015 03:39, William Blevins wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:23 PM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:wblevins001 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I ran that test in a loop for 10m or so and never got a failure
>>> though it might only happen when you thread it with other tests?
>>>
>>>     I see two potential issues:
>>>     1.  WhereIs('rpm') vs WhereIs('rpmbuild'); those two processes have
>>> been split out for a very long time.
>>>     2. If rpm_build_root is not unique then it could conflict with the
>>> other rpmbuild tests.
>>>
>>>
>>> I tried running all the rpm tests with -j6 in a loop; again there were
>>> no errors, so I don't know for sure.  Do you get a stack
>>> trace or something?
>>>
>>>
>> there is no stacktrace, the test fails because within the build an update
>> is triggered, when there should be none. (see below)
>> But this happens only spuriously...calling the single test seems to make
>> the frequency of failure lower, while running all "rpm" tests makes it
>> occur more often (can't back this up with data right now, just a first
>> impression).
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>>
>> ==========================================================
>>
>>
>> dirk at ubuntu:~/workspace/scons_commit$ python runtest.py
>> test/packaging/rpm
>> 1/6 (16.67%) /usr/bin/python -tt test/packaging/rpm/cleanup.py
>> STDOUT
>> =========================================================================
>> 1,6c1,6
>> < scons\:\ Reading\ SConscript\ files\ \.\.\.\
>> < scons\:\ done\ reading\ SConscript\ files\.\
>> < scons\:\ Building\ targets\ \.\.\.\
>> < scons\:\ \`\.\'\ is\ up\ to\ date\.\
>> < scons\:\ done\ building\ targets\.\
>> < .*
>> ---
>> > scons: Reading SConscript files ...
>> > scons: done reading SConscript files.
>> > scons: Building targets ...
>> > tar -zc -f foo-1.2.3.tar.gz foo-1.2.3/SConstruct foo-1.2.3/src/main.c
>> foo-1.2.3/foo-1.2.3.spec
>> > TAR_OPTIONS=--wildcards LC_ALL=C rpmbuild -ta --buildroot
>> /tmp/testcmd.3749._NfA8E/rpm_build_root
>> /tmp/testcmd.3749._NfA8E/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
>> > scons: done building targets.
>> FAILED test of /home/dirk/workspace/scons_commit/src/script/scons.py
>>         at line 605 of
>> /home/dirk/workspace/scons_commit/QMTest/TestCommon.py (_complete)
>>         from line 701 of
>> /home/dirk/workspace/scons_commit/QMTest/TestCommon.py (run)
>>         from line 390 of
>> /home/dirk/workspace/scons_commit/QMTest/TestSCons.py (run)
>>         from line 427 of
>> /home/dirk/workspace/scons_commit/QMTest/TestSCons.py (up_to_date)
>>         from line 88 of test/packaging/rpm/cleanup.py
>> 2/6 (33.33%) /usr/bin/python -tt test/packaging/rpm/explicit-target.py
>> PASSED
>> 3/6 (50.00%) /usr/bin/python -tt
>> test/packaging/rpm/internationalization.py
>> PASSED
>> 4/6 (66.67%) /usr/bin/python -tt test/packaging/rpm/multipackage.py
>> PASSED
>> 5/6 (83.33%) /usr/bin/python -tt test/packaging/rpm/package.py
>> PASSED
>> 6/6 (100.00%) /usr/bin/python -tt test/packaging/rpm/tagging.py
>> PASSED
>>
>> Failed the following test:
>>         test/packaging/rpm/cleanup.py
>> dirk at ubuntu:~/workspace/scons_commit$
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150807/fcf3b88b/attachment.html>