[Scons-dev] Question...(not flamebait)

[Dirk Bächle]

On 03.03.2014 20:37, Bill Deegan wrote:

> Anatoly,

>

> This is a bikeshed'ing type discussion.

> So we'll never agree on this.

>

> The project has long had the emacs/vim info in each source file, so 

> there's no reason to change.

> That said, some automated checking in buildbot might not be a bad idea.

>

> Though I'd put money that SCons source code (haveing long preceded 

> PEP8 rules) won't conform (at present) to PEP 8.

>

> It might be worthwhile to get there though as such automated checking 

> would get easier.

>

> Other opinions on PEP-8 formatting compliance?


I, personally, don't feel like I would write better code (or more code) 
with it. And as a user I don't care how the SCons sources look, as long 
as it's doing what I expect from it.

Let's all together try to get Python3-compliant instead... ;)

Regards,

Dirk