[reportlab-users] ReportLab 2.2 deployment options
    Dinu Gherman 
    gherman at darwin.in-berlin.de
       
    Mon Sep  1 08:11:22 EDT 2008
    
    
  
Andy Robinson:
> Q1. How badly do people want setuptools, eggs, easy_install and so on?
> Is plain old distutils good enough?
I'm still not a big fan of setuptools, but I also use it now and,
unfortunately (or rather: unfortunately we don't have anything
better), it has taken off already and enough people want it
*really* badly.
> Q2. Should we try to do "batteries included", with the accelerator,
> optional C libraries for rendering bitmaps and the type 1 fonts
> included in the basic package and one setup script to build it all?
Yes.
> Our worry is:  you can use a lot of functionality with just the Python
> code and maybe the _rl_accel.c extension.  But if we want to put the
> graphics extensions  "in the box", we introduce dependencies on
> libart, freetype, libjpeg, PIL and so on.  Due to limited resources,
> we'd aim to test on Ubuntu 8.04 and Windows, but we would not want to
> spend our own time trying to make convoluted setup scripts work with a
> gazillion distros.
Friendly error messages and comprehensive testing will be your
friends...
Dinu
    
    
More information about the reportlab-users
mailing list