[Scons-dev] Extension of the problem with submodulres definition in fortran (#3135)

[Bill Deegan]

Please attach the zip file to the github issue.
And add comments as to what constructs need to be supported which aren't
already described in the other comments and also by SCons

-Bill

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:10 AM Javier GONZALEZ PLATAS <jplatas at ull.edu.es>
wrote:

> Hello,
> I have found an extension of the problem reported as #3135 (May2018) about
> "Does not handle fortran submodules and type bound procedures correctly".
>
> For this case, someone give a solution to compile this type of files that
> it
> works only in a particular case but not in general (under my opinion).
>
> I'm sending a zip file containing a modified version from previous
> example. The main difference is that now there are two aditional files.
> The current version of SConstruct give again the problem.  In this case,
> the files used are  test_1.f90, test_2.f90, test_22.f90,
> test_submodules.f90.
>
> If you change the version test_22.f90 by test_21.f90 the scons works
> without problem. But in general, test_22.f90 is also a correct file.
>
> Any suggestion?
>
> Javier González Platas
>
>
>
> Departamento de Física
> Avda. Astrofísico Fco. Sánchez s/n
> Apartado 456
> 38200 La Laguna. S/C de Tenerife
>
> T. 922 318 251
> M. 629 080 140
>
> ull.es <https://www.ull.es/>
> ------------------------------
> Aviso de confidencialidad
> <https://www.ull.es/informacion-sobre-web-institucional/#aviso-confidencialidad>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20190422/ab26c946/attachment.html>