[Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests
Russel Winder
russel at winder.org.uk
Mon Jul 23 05:07:56 EDT 2018
On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 23:35 +0800, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
[…]
> Just a reminder that mindless do-ocracy is the best way to kill
> backward
> compatibility and lose user base. From the other side, it always
> possible to
> fork away something like waf. :)
That's why I mentioned Apache. As Jason has pointed out, there is a
formal structure to release, and hence testing, and big decision making
in general. The system is actually a good one – even though I have
many, many reservations about The Apache Way.
What's Waf's traction/market penetration like?
If one is to consider competitors to SCons, Meson is the threat.
--
Russel.
===========================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20180723/72b35f3c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list