[Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations

[Bill Deegan]

Simply put there are many more integrations with github than there are for
bitbucket.
Thus the drive to move there.
Also many developers already have github accounts but not bitbucket.
I don't see any value in staying on bitbucket if we're moving to git...

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jason Kenny <dragon512 at live.com> wrote:

> I think this is two different things
>
> Github vs bitbucket
>
> Git vs hg
>
> I think a better argument is moving to git from hg. This is an easier
> argument to make than trying to change two things.
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-bounces at scons.org] On Behalf Of Gaurav
> Juvekar
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 1:54 PM
> To: scons-dev at scons.org
> Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations
>
> On 2017-07-27 21:27, Bill Deegan wrote:
>
> > Post 3.0 - Migrate to GitHub
>
> Do you have any major challenges that could affect this right now?
> Migrating to GitHub might bring in more contributors, since hg is a
> significant learning curve to newcomers. Does this involve migrating the
> bug tracker to GitHub issues also?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Gaurav Juvekar
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20170727/d2c2c37b/attachment.html>