[Scons-dev] Closing files (patch)
Evan Driscoll
driscoll at cs.wisc.edu
Tue Jul 4 23:53:21 EDT 2017
On 07/04/2017 10:41 PM, Bill Deegan wrote:
> Any chance you can create a pull request on bitbucket for this?
> It's a lot simpler to merge that way.
Yeah, I'll submit one soon.
>> P.S. On scons.org <http://scons.org>, Development -> Development,
the "Developer's Guidelines" link is broken.
> The link is working for me.
> What's the URL it's pointing you to?
> For me it's pointing to:
> http://scons.org/dev.html <http://scons.org/dev.html>
"Development -> Development" works, and points me at that page. But *on*
that page there's a link to "Developer's Guidelines", " The complete
statement of guiding principles and procedures for SCons development."
That link goes to http://scons.org/%7Bfilenames%7D/development/guidelines.md
(The first path component is /{filenames}/ if you don't know hex
encoding of symbols off the top of your head...)
Evan
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Evan Driscoll <driscoll at cs.wisc.edu
> <mailto:driscoll at cs.wisc.edu>> wrote:
>
> I recently gave running SCons under PyPy a shot. It actually
> worked, except for running out of file descriptors due to the GC
> not closing things immediately.
>
> I went through and added some explicit close calls (actually,
> mostly 'with's) and then it worked fine. It looks like you
> actually picked up most of them (probably all the important ones)
> in 8716da8, but in case you wanted, I thought I'd send a patch
> with a few more. (We're using 2.5.0, and I'm not sure if the
> commit cited above landed in time for .1 or after that.)
>
> I don't know if the remainder matter though, or in the case of the
> MD5 change, if it's in code that's even called. (Though if it is
> called, it may well matter.) I just did a search for 'open' and
> made replacements for ones where it looked easy to do and I didn't
> have to think too hard. :-)
>
> Evan
>
> P.S. On scons.org <http://scons.org>, Development -> Development,
> the "Developer's Guidelines" link is broken.
>
> P.P.S. The FAQ still has the question "why is SCons written for
> Python 2.4"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org <mailto:Scons-dev at scons.org>
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> <https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20170704/a1122300/attachment.html>
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list