[Scons-dev] scons -j

[Bill Deegan]

As far as I know the intent was that flags copied from make would behave
the same where possible.
So likely this is a bug.

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 1:17 PM, James Corey <jc-scons at neniam.net> wrote:

> Could be an anti-feature if people type -j without a number when they
> don't mean to...
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:22 AM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Russel,
> >
> > Depends. If I remember correctly, '-j' with no options just means
> unlimited
> > jobs. I don't know how often that is actually useful.
> >
> > V/R,
> > William
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I see make can take no parameters to the -j option but SCons cannot. Is
> >> this a bug to be fixed? I think it should be, but…
> >>
> >> --
> >> Russel.
> >>
> >> ============================================================
> =================
> >> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
> >> sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
> >> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
> >> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Scons-dev mailing list
> >> Scons-dev at scons.org
> >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scons-dev mailing list
> > Scons-dev at scons.org
> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20160917/36318b9a/attachment.html>