[Scons-dev] Should we close python3-port branch in scons bitbucket?

[Russel Winder]

On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 10:18 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
> Russel,
> 
> I've pulled from your python3-port branch into a scons owned repo and
> updated.
> Running tests, then I'll push back to scons/scons repo.
> 
> Should I then merge down to scons/scons ?

Sorry to be late answering this, but it seems the tests passed as much
as gave you confidence to do the deed.

> Running tests now. (on python3-port with changes pulled from your
> repo)
> ssh://hg@bitbucket.org/russel/scons__python3
> -Bill

Given the history in this repository is different to that in the SCons
mainline, I think this repository has now fulfilled its destiny and can
now fade into history.

I will take a new clone form SCons mainline for any further work on
this so that standard pull requests can be used.

I keep 12 months of filestore history so although the repository will
go from BitBucket, it still exists for the next year and so can
reappear..

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20160509/9b8757f7/attachment.pgp>