[Scons-dev] Should we close python3-port branch in scons bitbucket?

[Russel Winder]

On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 22:03 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote:
> Jason,
> 
> 
> I think the initial plan was to use six, and we've switched to
> futurize.
> Russel - Please correct if I'm incorrect..
> 

Sounds right to me. General consensus amongst the Python folk I polled
privately before deleting al the six stuff was that unless 2.5 and 2.6
were to be supported six was too heavyweight. With only 2.7 to support
the future package is far more lightweight and provides fewer code
differences.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20160509/92a93a1c/attachment.pgp>