[Scons-dev] Using scons as setup.py

[Bill Deegan]

Shared key dicts?

I know with python 2.7 it made non-trivial memory and speed differences.

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Daniel Holth <dholth at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thought that didn't matter anymore with shared key dicts. I'll ask on
> users.
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016, 10:55 Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>> The move to slots decreased memory footprint and runtime.
>>
>> I thought other's had scons >2.4.0 running in pypy without having to muck
>> with slots.
>> You might ask in users mailing list
>>
>> -Bill
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Daniel Holth <dholth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am working on doing some experiments using scons as the setup.py
>>> implementation. I want to be able to package wheel files more flexibly than
>>> setuptools would allow, and it's nice to have a good, easier to use build
>>> system. A new pip feature will allow dependencies before setup.py is called.
>>>
>>> Had to find/replace __slots__ to __slats__ to get it to run in pypy. How
>>> badly do you need slots?
>>>
>>> Daniel Holth
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20160604/a30012ab/attachment-0001.html>