[Scons-dev] Python 3 strategy

[William Blevins]

Yeah we wouldn't delete the current changes.
On Jan 25, 2016 3:22 PM, "Gary Oberbrunner" <garyo at oberbrunner.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> The alternative is to abandon the current python3-port and start again
>> from default based solely on future.
>>
>
> This doesn't seem crazy to me, although there was a LOT of hand-tweaking
> of code on the current python3 branch: utf8/locale stuff, print stmts,
> which in a fair number of cases didn't look like any automation would've
> caught them. So if you start again I suspect most of that work will have to
> be redone. I spent a couple of days on it, iirc, and I wasn't the only one.
> Maybe some of those changes could be cherry-picked over? I suggest skimming
> some of my changes on that branch (not the merges, just the by-hand stuff)
> to get a sense of what had to be done.
>
> --
> Gary
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20160125/d160bb5e/attachment.html>