[Scons-dev] That was easy…

[Russel Winder]

On Sat, 2015-12-26 at 16:00 -0800, Bill Deegan wrote:
> If we change to suggesting pip/easy_install to be the preferred
> method of
> installing, then we can include any other packages we need and not
> have to
> "Vendorize" them.

Or for real operating system distributions with package management,
just install with the package manager.

On these system we do not need to vendorize since when SCons is
packaged it can be dependent on future and everything is OK.

So the issue is people who install from the SCons release. Is it fair
to require them to pip things in? Can we have two releases one pure
SCons and one SCons plus future packaged at the moment of creating the
package and not vendorized in the SCons repository.
 
-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20160110/3de63724/attachment.pgp>