[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3
Bill Deegan
bill at baddogconsulting.com
Wed Sep 9 13:49:22 EDT 2015
SCons supports >=2.7 <3.0
As far as I know, the idea was to not break 2.6 if it was reasonable not
to, but no guarantee.
Clearly starting work on 2.7 & 3.0 compatible source code would mean 2.6
would be dropped entirely.
I've not read the release notes on 2.7.*, is there some significant
difference WRT 3.x compatability in any given version?
-Bill
Co-Manager, SCons Project
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Tim Jenness <tjenness at lsst.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 9, 2015, at 10:16 , Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > There is a flurry of activity on porting Bazaar so it run on Python
> > 2.6+ and Python 3. There seems to be a consensus that assuming 3.4 as
> > the base Python 3 version is a good idea.
> >
> > SCons already assumes Python 2.7, but is there a base bugfix version?
> > This matters as it determines how much of Python 3 can be assumed.
> >
>
> I have no visibility into how the python3 scons branch is keeping up with
> current releases.
>
> > Are we going to drop the requirement to run on Python 2.6? Currently
> > 2.7 is the base but people keep making changes to have things run on
> > 2.6.
> >
>
> The last few release notes have been insistently stating that pythons
> older than 2.7 will no longer be supported by scons so this is a bit
> confusing if scons is still trying to support 2.6.
>
> —
> Tim Jenness
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150909/4c4f5d95/attachment.html>
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list