[Scons-dev] Upgrading Mailman to 3.0?

[Bill Deegan]

Anatoly,

No.
We don't host mailman. The webhost does.

-Bill

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:20 AM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
> > On 28.05.2015 09:01, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> >>
> >> I just wonder if we can try newer Mailman to power SCons
> >> communication.
> >
> > I hadn't noticed that our mailing list communication is so bad that we
> need
> > to power it up. And for me, power in discussions and texts and documents
> > still comes mainly from their content...not from the tools that transport
> > the latter. ;)
>
> Well, I'd prefer stuff like http://try.discourse.org/ for communication.
> List seem a little dated. Now I am subscribed and rather active, but for
> one
> who is not so deeply involved, using all that oldschool stuff may be hard.
>
> >> That may bring greater good than newer web site.
> >
> > It may, or it may not. It's a coin toss, but might also only be a
> > fifty-fifty chance. :)
>
> Well, a proper hypothesis and assessment tests might improve the
> chance. =)
>
> >> I
> >> expect to finally find search button there.
> >>
> >
> > I'm unsure about what you're trying to say here: Do you simply *wish*
> for a
> > "find" button to be there, or do you actually *know* that Mailman has
> one?
>
> Well, if Mailman 3 won't have the search, then we can switch to discourse.
> --
> anatoly t.
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150528/69fdf800/attachment.html>