[Scons-dev] Review scons.org/guidelines.php

[Bill Deegan]

Also remember there's two different items in the web site.
The "static" part which is controlled by the few committers to the scons
website repo, and the wiki which is intended to be more open.

The way the wiki is configured is such that all changes have to be approved
unless they have superuser priveleges, so an pull request driven wiki would
be no real different?

-Bill

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:

> If it's hg or git backed, then they can just make pull requests.
> No problem.
> This would eliminate any spam problem.
>
> -Bill
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> On 13.05.2015 22:53, Bill Deegan wrote:
>>
>>> Dirk,
>>>
>>> As a member of the plone community  (I manage baypiggies.net <
>>> http://baypiggies.net>). I'm thinking it's likely overkill.
>>>
>>
>> I'm watching Home Improvement Season 1 Episode 2 right now on YouTube...
>> What do we need? More power! ;)
>>
>>  I've been playing with pelican (static site generator) and that combined
>>> with a hg or git repo and some scripting would turn out
>>> pretty nicely I think.  Not to mention would have a much lighter load on
>>> the webserver.
>>>
>>>
>> Well, my basic idea was to get away from a purely static site...it would
>> again be hard to contribute for people without "commit access".
>>
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150513/529303fb/attachment.html>