[Scons-dev] Issue tracker

[Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)]

I realise that it's going to be a major effort to transfer all the existing issues from Tigris, but how much work would it be to  *start* accepting tickets on bitbucket? There's a lot of stuff that looks like it's more-or-less defunct on Tigris (version 1 bugs...) and just seeing newly raised bugs along with the current code would be a major usability improvement.

I'd be happy to transfer my (very small number of) existing bugs over if the system was there.

From: scons-dev at scons.org At: Mar  9 2015 01:42:01
To: scons-dev at scons.org
Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Issue tracker

A reason to switch to hit would be that the bulk of open source uses git and using hg adds to burden of contributing to SCons.

-Bill

On Saturday, March 7, 2015, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk> wrote:

On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 22:35 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Ok. We can, actually move the stuff from tigris.org to BB. Just don't know when.

If we continue to use Mercurial and BitBucket (*) then the sooner the
better. Having the issues on Tigris not on BitBucket is becoming less
and less credible week by week.


(*) Which we will obviously, as there is no reason to change to Git on
BitBucket (as Atlassian would surely like to see happen) or Git on
GitHub (even though Go has ditched Mercurial for Git)

--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev at scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150309/7fcc184b/attachment.html>