[Scons-dev] Problem using doc toolchain?

[Bill Deegan]

Did a clean python, libxml2-2.9.2, libxslt-1.28 from source (ran into an
issue with libpython.so from system python causing core dump with got me
stuck for a while because the error you get until you dig into it just
indicates that expat was not built with your python.. blog posting to
follow on that fun).

Once I sorted expat issue, and run
/home/bdbaddog/tools/python-2.7.10/bin/python bin/docs-update-generated.py
/home/bdbaddog/tools/python-2.7.10/bin/python bin/docs-validate.py
/home/bdbaddog/tools/python-2.7.10/bin/python
bin/docs-create-example-outputs.py

I get only the following diffs:
M doc/generated/examples/caching_ex-random_1.xml
   http://pastebin.com/UwE75eTY
M doc/generated/examples/troubleshoot_explain1_3.xml
  http://pastebin.com/3n2f3e4y
M doc/generated/variables.gen
  http://pastebin.com/UnhexDVR
M doc/generated/variables.mod
   http://pastebin.com/E1nXYupB

Are these all valid?
Is there an easy way to check them (aka a tool?)

-Bill


On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:11 AM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dirk,
>
> I had lxslt installed but not python-lxslt.  Once that was installed it
> was obvious that it switched from lxml to lxml2 usage.  I still got another
> error.
> On Jul 31, 2015 3:18 AM, "Dirk Bächle" <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Bill,
>>
>> On 30.07.2015 17:36, Bill Deegan wrote:
>>
>>>  From the code I've looked at if you have libxml2 & libxslt that is
>>> preferred, and then if not it will use lxml.
>>>
>>>
>> your assumption is correct, this is done because libxml2 is faster in
>> general.
>>
>> It seems that libxml2 and pure lxml have different behaviour regarding
>> "normalizing namespaces" and that's where the diff comes from. This makes
>> at least the validation in the SernaFree XML editor choke for the lxml
>> output...:(
>>
>> I'm investigating this a little further and will try to find a way around
>> this. I'd really like to have the (almost) same output for both XML
>> toolchains, such that it gets accepted by most XML editors out there.
>>
>> @William: You said that after installing an additional package the
>> processing got faster and correct? My guess would be that you now have a
>> lxml distro/package that relies on libxml2 under the hood. This makes the
>> error go away of course...
>>
>>
>> I'll keep you posted, best regards,
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150731/f881cfd4/attachment.html>