[Scons-dev] Cross-language support
William Blevins
wblevins001 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 20:16:43 EDT 2015
Jason,
As previously stated in the pull request comments, I expect some tests to
fail currently because of the recursive header install issue (topic #1):
<lang>SUFFIXES, HeaderInstall.py. The other tests may or may not be
related.
There is more value in looking at those tests first. It may also be
valuable to go back 3-4 commits to the closest ancestor of the default
branch and run tests there, so that we can see if some of the tests failed
previously. Also, if we think its a problem of the current location of
that divergent head, then we can see if a rebase fixes some of them.
V/R,
William
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Jason Kenny <dragon512 at live.com> wrote:
> ok not any better...
>
>
> Failed the following 16 tests:
> test\Batch\action-changed.py
> test\CPPSUFFIXES.py
> test\DSUFFIXES.py
> test\Fortran\FORTRANSUFFIXES.py
> test\HeaderInstall.py
> test\MSVS\vs-9.0-exec.py
> test\Win32\mingw.py
> test\exitfns.py
> test\implicit\IMPLICIT_COMMAND_DEPENDENCIES.py
> test\import.py
> test\long-lines\signature.py
> test\scons-time\run\config\python.py
> test\scons-time\run\option\python.py
> test\sconsign\script\SConsignFile.py
> test\sconsign\script\Signatures.py
> test\sconsign\script\no-SConsignFile.py
>
> I would need to dig down to see what is failing and why
> Jason
>
>
> *From:* Jason Kenny <dragon512 at live.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 5:38 PM
> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support
>
> ok I have it fixed... I am rerunning the tests now
> Jason
>
> *From:* Jason Kenny <dragon512 at live.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 5:30 PM
> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support
>
> I must have messed up. I only see debugCount and JniHeaderDir bookmarks
> at the moment.
>
> Jason
>
> *From:* William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:50 PM
> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support
>
> That's a SCons fork. Not an HG branch (in case its a terminology
> problem). Make sure you are using the CrossLanguage bookmark.
>
> V/R,
> William
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kenny <dragon512 at live.com> wrote:
>
>> branch *SCons_20150323 *
>>
>> I can will setup from scratch again and try again.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> *From:* William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:38 PM
>> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support
>>
>> Jason,
>>
>> Are you sure you are using the correct commit revision?
>>
>> None of those tests are failing on my Linux distro, and I haven't
>> modified any of those tests either. Plus, tests that I am expecting to
>> fail are apparently passing.
>>
>> V/R,
>> William
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Jason Kenny <dragon512 at live.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So a quick pass of the tests has these failures
>>>
>>> Failed the following 15 tests:
>>> test\Batch\action-changed.py
>>> test\MSVS\vs-9.0-exec.py
>>> test\Win32\mingw.py
>>> test\exitfns.py
>>> test\implicit\IMPLICIT_COMMAND_DEPENDENCIES.py
>>> test\import.py
>>> test\long-lines\signature.py
>>> test\option\debug-count.py
>>> test\option\debug-multiple.py
>>> test\option\debug-objects.py
>>> test\scons-time\run\config\python.py
>>> test\scons-time\run\option\python.py
>>> test\sconsign\script\SConsignFile.py
>>> test\sconsign\script\Signatures.py
>>> test\sconsign\script\no-SConsignFile.py
>>>
>>> *From:* Jason Kenny <dragon512 at live.com>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 2:32 PM
>>> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support
>>>
>>> Ok let me update the branch and re-run everything.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> *From:* William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 10:30 AM
>>> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support
>>>
>>> Jason,
>>>
>>> I'm not sure. I remember that you were helping me look into the
>>> recursive Install behavior. Plus, possible parts incompatibility?
>>>
>>> I haven't ran the tests on a windows box at all. I don't expect
>>> anything new, but it should be done before it ships :)
>>>
>>> V/R,
>>> William
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Jason Kenny <dragon512 at live.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which MS toolchain on windows do we need tested? I can do a test run
>>>> this afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> *From:* William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 1:11 AM
>>>> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support
>>>>
>>>> Happy with it*
>>>>
>>>> Until the review is complete, and I can perhaps get a few more guinea
>>>> pigs to try it out, it's hard to make a concrete projection. I have 3 items
>>>> listed out that need to be given a thumbs up/down at a minimum:
>>>>
>>>> * Item #1 is still mostly outstanding. I'm not sure how to address,
>>>> please see the discussion Jason and I started a few weeks ago under the
>>>> pull request comments.
>>>>
>>>> * Item #2 requires no changes (to my knowledge), but someone with more
>>>> QT knowledge may say otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> * I may already have most of the patch for Item #3 (IE. no scanner for
>>>> key) based on today's feedback.
>>>>
>>>> I also still need to request test runs on Windows, and for toolchains
>>>> that I may not have installed or instructions to install them (EG. D).
>>>>
>>>> V/R,
>>>> William
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:58 AM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As soon as we are happen with it :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> O.k. let me push 2.3.5 with the visual studio 2015 stuff.
>>>>>> Then we'll changed to 2.4 merge slots. stabilize. release.
>>>>>> Then this code? (2.5?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Bill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Jason Kenny <dragon512 at live.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been using the slots drop for a while with Parts. I think
>>>>>>> it is ready. It does have a notable improvement in speed and memory size. I
>>>>>>> would before getting this out as officially earlier than later.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:31 PM
>>>>>>> *To:* Dirk Bächle <dl9obn at darc.de> ; SCons developer list
>>>>>>> <scons-dev at scons.org>
>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sorry for chiming in so late.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 28.07.2015 23:44, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, that's how we've done it in the past. Sounds like doing it
>>>>>>>>> at the same time as slots would be perfect.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Doing this in parallel with the "slots" change sounds good to me
>>>>>>>> too. +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not opposed to releasing in the same update as slots, but since
>>>>>>> the cross language code reviews haven't been finished, I don't want to
>>>>>>> delay slots since it is ready now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The pessimist in me as sees doing two major enhancements in the same
>>>>>>> release as higher risk; I don't foresee any issues, but its worth the
>>>>>>> thought if the release overhead isn't too bad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com <mailto:bill at baddogconsulting.com>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gary,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For such a change we should bump the second digit?
>>>>>>>>> 2.4?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I agree we should not turn down a change because it will cause
>>>>>>>>> rebuilds where the past didn't as long as it is now more correct
>>>>>>>>> (which it should be with this change).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, "forward" is the way to go. ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also agree we should be verbose in our notification of the
>>>>>>>>> impacts of the new change to avoid (as much as we can) "surprises".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think (better: hope) we did a good enough job for the "slots"
>>>>>>>> stuff on this. For the scanner changes, I see them more like a fix...so a
>>>>>>>> single announcement should be sufficient?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Finally, and just in case I haven't done so already, I'd like to
>>>>>>>> thank William for all the work he's done on this issue. I couldn't help as
>>>>>>>> much as I would've liked, but with Gary's support you tackled this down and
>>>>>>>> brought it to a good end. Kudos to you...bravo!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Truly appreciated. I have spent a lot of time on this issue despite
>>>>>>> what one might expect from the number of lines of code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was honestly my first time working in a "real" python environment
>>>>>>> outside of scripting, and the SCons code base is rather complex. It
>>>>>>> instills me greater appreciation for the work that has already done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I also want to thank everyone here for their help past and future,
>>>>>>> but don't pat me on the back until its done. I might get lazy :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dirk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150729/bc45bdce/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list