[Scons-dev] Adding Visual Studio 2015 Support to SCons
Rob Smith (WINDOWS)
robs at microsoft.com
Fri Jul 24 17:25:13 EDT 2015
Unfortunately I’m not aware of a program at Microsoft to donate build machines to open source projects.
From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-bounces at scons.org] On Behalf Of Bill Deegan
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:26 AM
To: SCons developer list
Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Adding Visual Studio 2015 Support to SCons
Rob,
Thanks for the patch!
Any chance we can convince you to provide a buildbot slave for testing on the windows platform?
;)
I'm going to take a look through the remaining pull requests over the next couple days and if any of those look simple I may pull them in and push a new release.
Regardless I'd think a new release with this patch should get out in the next couple weeks.
-Bill
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Rob Smith (WINDOWS) <robs at microsoft.com<mailto:robs at microsoft.com>> wrote:
The other pull request was merged and kicked off a new build which passed 100% (I verified this ran the new VS 14 tests): http://buildbot.scons.org/builders/win7-64-vs20102.7/ Looks like we should be good now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-bounces at scons.org<mailto:scons-dev-bounces at scons.org>] On Behalf Of Dirk Bächle
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 1:27 PM
To: scons-dev at scons.org<mailto:scons-dev at scons.org>
Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Adding Visual Studio 2015 Support to SCons
Rob,
On 23.07.2015 18:54, Rob Smith (WINDOWS) wrote:
> Looks like the build is exiting immediately because it doesn't find any new changes:
>
yes, but it should actually detect that it's not at the latest revision available. Triggering a build manually should not rely on the "hg pull" to emit new changes, because if the update to the "tip" revision was missed last time, it gets missed again and again...until finally a new commit is added to the repository.
Another scenario would include a person logging into the build machine and doing a "hg update" on the command line, such that the sources point to a completely unrelated revision!
Bill, can we somehow add an "always-update-to-latest-revision" step for the manual trigger? We should be safe for normal commits because we have a corresponding commit ID there, right?
Best regards,
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev at scons.org<mailto:Scons-dev at scons.org>
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev at scons.org<mailto:Scons-dev at scons.org>
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150724/6c43f0e2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list