[Scons-dev] Clang support

[William Blevins]

Im not sure what percentage of linux devs use clang vs gcc, but my
personal experience is gcc is more widely used.

Yet another gcc user,
William
On Jan 5, 2015 6:51 PM, "Russel Winder" <russel at winder.org.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:48 +0100, Paweł Tomulik wrote:
> […]
> > I have a project where I just set construction variables CC=clang and
> > CXX=clang++ and it works well (I check existence of these compilers with
> > SConf, so I don't need the Tool machinery to search for the compiler
> > executables).
> >
> > Some time ago I also wrote these two tools:
> >
> > https://github.com/ptomulik/scons-tool-clang
> > https://github.com/ptomulik/scons-tool-clangpp
> >
> > but for some (forgotten) reason I don't use them :)
>
> This may work fine, but if SCons does not have tools called clang, clang
> ++, clanglink *AND* detection of clang for the cc, c++ and link tools,
> then SCons has no credible support for Clang.
>
> My real question is whether SCons should prefer clang over gcc for
> Linux.
>
> --
> Russel.
>
> =============================================================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
> sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150105/b5c363e0/attachment.html>