[Scons-dev] D tool issue on Stack Overflow

Bill Deegan bill at baddogconsulting.com
Sat Feb 21 19:10:34 EST 2015


Per,

In general we like to add a new test per failure.
The fixture setup should make it easier to construct one.

-Bill

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Per Nordlöw <per.nordlow at gmail.com> wrote:

> Isn't there already existing test for this that can be extend?
>
> Hälsningar,
> Per Nordlöw
>
> 2015-02-22 1:06 GMT+01:00 Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>:
>
>> Russel,
>>
>> You're our resident D expert. Does that seem reasonable to you?
>>
>> Per - Any chance you can work up a testcase to test for what's being
>> fixed?  SCons development has a test requirement for most patches.
>> See here: http://www.scons.org/wiki/DeveloperGuide/TestingMethodology
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bill
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28647348/faulty-d-dependency-logic-in-scons
>>>
>>> --
>>> Russel.
>>>
>>> =============================================================================
>>> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
>>> sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
>>> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
>>> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150221/ad8ff103/attachment.html>


More information about the Scons-dev mailing list