[Scons-dev] SCons-like build system
Dirk Bächle
tshortik at gmx.de
Sun Feb 1 13:53:51 EST 2015
Hi all,
On 27.01.2015 17:26, Kenny, Jason L wrote:
> I think it is that Parts tries to use DB data smarter than SCons does. For me the understanding of the logic needed to validate that
> something is good or bad with MD5 I believe is the item that I had to learned from SCons.
> [...]
>
during the last few days I ran and profiled SCons for the 100k files benchmark example, created by genbench.py from Aqualid's
"example/benchmark" folder. All the single runs were performed on a COTS quad-core machine (4*AMD A8-6600K @ 1.9GHz) with 8GB RAM.
For Aqualid 0.5.2 I get:
Clean build (-j 1) = 12:37:53
Clean build (-j 4) = 4:41:33
Update (w/o changes) = 0:00:59.77
For the standard SCons 2.3.4:
Clean build (-j 1) = 14:09:54
Clean build (-j 4) = 5:38:46
Update (w/o changes) = 0:17:20.25
Update (max-drift=1) = 0:17:00.07
For the experimental SCons version (switched Node class to slots + stubprocess.py wrapper), including some hacks to exploit the
uniform structure of the benchmark sources, I could reduce this down to:
Clean build (-j 1) = 10:58:50
Clean build (-j 4) = 3:44:20
Update (w/o changes) = 0:08:38.38
Update (max-drift=1) = 0:04:27.77
The much higher times for Aqualid in the parallel build (-j 4) come from the processing order, which queues all library archiving to
the end of the build. This sent my machine thrashing/swapping, even though it has 8GB RAM...SCons is better balanced in this case,
it creates each lib as soon as all its sources are compiled.
I also ran a "clean/remove target" on a smaller project with 10k files each:
Aqualid (aql --clean) = 3:51.93
SCons (scons -c) = 0:19.94
, this looks like a bug in Aqualid to me.
Find attached the memory consumption for a "parallel clean build" (-j 4) run with SCons...
Best regards,
Dirk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mem_parallel.png
Type: image/png
Size: 36327 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150201/1b5a5e49/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list