[Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

[Bill Deegan]

All,

So are we good with:
http://contributor-covenant.org/

If so I'll add it to the new website.

-Bill

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:

> Anatoly,
>
> Am 28.12.2015 um 15:33 schrieb anatoly techtonik:
>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I'm not sure why you're objecting to this unless you think you are
>>> likely to
>>> violate a CoC..
>>>
>> Because following CoC makes people CoC-followers, which is offensive for
>> some. Don't be a jerk rule is good enough and the rules should be applied
>> only when they are needed on personal basis.
>>
>> I am against CoCs. It makes me feel regulated and I am sick and tired of
>> that,
>> so I likely to act against it and you have to ban me.
>>
> feel free to "act against it", but "filibustering" (refer to
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/filibuster and optionally
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q52kFL8zVoM ) won't help. We've already
> reached consensus to have a simple CoC and are simply ironing out the last
> details.
>
> @all: Are we ready to move on with this one and take some action? I am...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dirk
>
> P.S.: Nobody wants to ban you. We'll simply continue with our plan and are
> ready to face the consequences of you getting "sick and tired" about
> feeling regulated again...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20151229/8f186675/attachment.html>