[Scons-dev] That was easy…

[Bill Deegan]

If we change to suggesting pip/easy_install to be the preferred method of
installing, then we can include any other packages we need and not have to
"Vendorize" them.

On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 13:15 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> >
> […]
> >
> > I should have said, I don't think we can make installing future a
> > requirement for using scons.
> >
> > In my case, I was using lineprofiler.  It does something strange
> > with
> > builtins, and the reason lineprofiler mysteriously stopped working
> > after
> > future was installed was hard to find.
>
> So the consequence of this is that we can only go to a level 1 futurize
> and then the rest needs to be manually hacked so that there is no
> future dependency? I suspect this means we will end up rewriting quite
> a chunk of future, though not the bits needed for Python 2.6.
>
> --
> Russel.
>
> =============================================================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
> sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20151226/c8ca9083/attachment.html>