[Scons-dev] That was easy…

Russel Winder russel at winder.org.uk
Sat Dec 26 12:19:18 EST 2015


On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 13:15 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> 
[…]
> 
> I should have said, I don't think we can make installing future a 
> requirement for using scons.
> 
> In my case, I was using lineprofiler.  It does something strange
> with 
> builtins, and the reason lineprofiler mysteriously stopped working
> after 
> future was installed was hard to find.

So the consequence of this is that we can only go to a level 1 futurize
and then the rest needs to be manually hacked so that there is no
future dependency? I suspect this means we will end up rewriting quite
a chunk of future, though not the bits needed for Python 2.6.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20151226/76c83221/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Scons-dev mailing list