[Scons-dev] That was easy…
Russel Winder
russel at winder.org.uk
Sat Dec 26 12:19:18 EST 2015
On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 13:15 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>
[…]
>
> I should have said, I don't think we can make installing future a
> requirement for using scons.
>
> In my case, I was using lineprofiler. It does something strange
> with
> builtins, and the reason lineprofiler mysteriously stopped working
> after
> future was installed was hard to find.
So the consequence of this is that we can only go to a level 1 futurize
and then the rest needs to be manually hacked so that there is no
future dependency? I suspect this means we will end up rewriting quite
a chunk of future, though not the bits needed for Python 2.6.
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20151226/76c83221/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list