[Scons-dev] New symlink copy support

[anatoly techtonik]

No, my suggestion is that license file is updated with the names of
contributors, including Intel copyright line.

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Kenny, Jason L
<jason.l.kenny at intel.com> wrote:
> So your suggestion is that I update the license file with Scons Foundation?
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-bounces at scons.org] On Behalf Of anatoly techtonik
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 12:21 PM
> To: SCons developer list
> Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] New symlink copy support
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Kenny, Jason L <jason.l.kenny at intel.com> wrote:
>> Ideally that is the hope I have.. CCopy should be used as the backbone
>> of all copied in Parts and I hope in SCons. Everything in Parts is
>> done so it could be added to SCons. The license is MIT under Intel,
>> but it is assumed that SCons will own all this code as it moves stuff
>> over. Intel has no interest in controlling a build system.
>
> As long as license is MIT, there is no need to transfer copyright. Just add the appropriate line to LICENSE file. In fact, I prefer this way of doing things, like in Twisted.
>
> https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/trunk/LICENSE
>
> Then at the top of each file we just reference the LICENSE.
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev



-- 
anatoly t.