[Scons-dev] Issues that can potentially be closed

[William Blevins]

In this case, the issue is a lot simpler than that because it has to do
with the Java emitter directly.  The test that I am trying to provide is a
much better, general case test.  If we solve that test, then we fix ALL
derived source cases ;)


On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:

> On 12.07.2014 16:32, William Blevins wrote:
>
>> For 1771, my protoc builder changes aren't important.
>>
>>  This is not so much about importance, but traceability and being able to
> reproduce your findings later. Take a look at issue #1438 in the bug
> tracker. It's now suggested by Andrew to get closed, mainly because the
> error can't be reproduced...which later might happen to your issue too.
>
> I'm just sayin', it's still your decision. ;)
>
> Dirk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140713/ac967d0f/attachment.html>