[Scons-dev] What to replace the wiki with?

[anatoly techtonik]

I think we just need hosting with better protection.

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
> Bill,
>
>
> On 12.12.2014 00:52, Bill Deegan wrote:
>
> I'm thinking a hg repo and some sort of ci to process it when new changes
> come in.
> Or use readthedocs.org (It has integration with bitbucket for such already)
>
> That way users and do pull requests and also the webserver only has to
> handle serving static pages.
>
> Is it reasonable to expect that users who wanted to contribute to wiki-like
> content could handle mercurial?
>
> it's probably not so much about hg (or any other tool, for that matter), but
> about the workflow that's required for getting one's changes in. To me it
> feels like we're moving away from a more "scratchpad"-like medium, to static
> pages. That would be okay if we had several authors and technical writers
> that could create lots of pages with content. But this would mean that we
> provide all the information, and we are responsible for keeping things
> alive.
> If that's what we want, fine.
> It more or less boils down to the question: Do we want a Wiki (static pages)
> for us, or for our users?
>
> Just some late night thoughts, to fuel the discussion...
>
> Regards,
>
> Dirk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>



-- 
anatoly t.