[Scons-dev] Test failures with biblattex

[Managan, Rob]

Hi Dirk,

While I have no objection I will note that with biblatex version 1.2 the .bcf file gets generated even for the minimal case of only including the \usepackage{bib latex}. I am presuming that you have a later version that does not bother to write out the boilerplate material unless it is actually needed.

Still I think if later versions do not generate the file we can remove it from the list.

Thanks for fixing this,
Rob

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
Rob Managan                             email managan at llnl.gov
LLNL                                             phone: 925-423-0903
P.O. Box 808, L-095                   FAX:   925-422-3389
Livermore, CA  94551-0808


On 8/7/14, 2:00 PM, "Dirk Bächle" <tshortik at gmx.de<mailto:tshortik at gmx.de>> wrote:

On 07.08.2014 01:39, Dirk Bächle wrote:
Hi guys,
[...]

I removed the "/tmp/par-*" folders, and biber seems to work again (versions of biber and biblatex match locally).
In the next days, I'll let another pull request follow to get my Buildslaves "green" again....


Okay, I created pull request #162. Bill, can you review this one? Feel free to merge/accept it right away, it should be a fast-forward one...

@Rob: In the pull request I'm removing the '.bcf' extension from the test "biblatex_plain.py". The TeX file in question doesn't even contain a "\bibliography" entry, so it's probably too much to expect that a BCF is created. I hope this is okay, please object otherwise...

Regards,

Dirk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140807/c9c255f2/attachment.html>