[Scons-dev] Issue 2869 - Versioned shared libraries
William Deegan
bill at baddogconsulting.com
Thu Oct 25 20:33:54 EDT 2012
All,
On Oct 25, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Chris BeHanna <chris at behanna.org> wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 15:07 , "Managan, Rob" <managan1 at llnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Thanks for the info. Sounds like I should have the Install function check
>> that the version numbers match. In the use case where Install does not
>> know what the version number is then I will believe the one in the library
>> name!
>>
>> Of course, in the example from Eric Raymond on OSX there is only one
>> symlink and the version number is located differently.
>
> Yes, it's very, very different on OS X. OS X uses "Mach-O" format rather than ELF, and spells ".so" as ".dylib", plus it reverses the order of the version number and the file type suffix:
>
> libcurl.so.4 => libcurl.4.dylib
>
> Mach-O also uses a "compatibility version" that is distinct from the version that appears in the filename. :-/
Does the implementation work with both linux and OSX?
-Bill
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list