[Scons-dev] README in repository
Dirk Bächle
tshortik at gmx.de
Tue Oct 9 16:38:00 EDT 2012
Hi guys,
On 09.10.2012 19:39, William Deegan wrote:
> Russel,
>
>
> On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
>> the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to
>>
>> a) ReStructured Text, README.rst
>> b) Markdown, README.md or README.markdown
>>
>> I have a slight preference fro Markdown due to the way it handles header
>> markup compared to ReStructured Text. On the other hand Markdown is very
>> Ruby, GitHub, whilst ReStructured Text is very Python.
>>
>> Why the change? So that the read me file look reasonable on the
>> BitBucket page.
>>
>> I can do the markup once a decision is made so there is no need for
>> anything other than a decision.
> I vote for .rst (mainly because I'm already using it on a number of other projects and it's python'y)
+1 from me for reST (*.rst). I use it quite a lot recently...at home as
well as at work.
Dirk
> -Bill
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list