[Scons-dev] Tool order

[Russel Winder]

Dirk,

0n Sun, 2012-11-11 at 10:56 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote:

> Hi Russel,

> 

> yes the order can be important, depending on which variables and 

> Builders are touched by the Tools. If both are working on disjunct sets 

> of settings there shouldn't be a difference though...but it's better to 

> not rely on this.

> There is no enforcement rule saying that Tools always have to work in an 

> orthogonal way.


I guess the question then is whether:

	tools=['g++', 'gnulink']
and
	tools=['gnulink', 'g++']

work and if they do then dmd, gdc and ldc should work as well. Do you
happen to know if this sort of thing tested for in the SCons test suite?

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20121111/a0fd7f04/attachment.pgp>