[reportlab-users] code128.py

[Klaas Feenstra]

Hi Robin,

I have checked your test. I think we are almost there, but
 0: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 6 b b b STOP(15) --> START_B b b b b TO_C 12
34 56 TO_B b b b STOP(14)
 1: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 b b b STOP(14) --> START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5
b b b STOP(14)
 2: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 b b b STOP(13) --> START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 b b
b STOP(13)
 3: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 b b b STOP(12) --> START_B b b b b 1 2 3 b b b
STOP(12)
 4: START_B b b b b 1 2 b b b STOP(11) --> START_B b b b b 1 2 b b b
STOP(11)
 5: START_B b b b b 1 b b b STOP(10) --> START_B b b b b 1 b b b STOP(10)
 6: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 6 TO_A a a STOP(15) --> START_B b b b b TO_C
12 34 56 TO_A a a STOP(13)
 7: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 TO_A a a STOP(13) --> START_B b b b b TO_C 12
34 TO_A a a STOP(12)
 8: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 TO_A a a STOP(12) --> START_B b b b b 1 2 3 TO_A
a a STOP(12)
 9: START_B b b b b 1 2 TO_A a a STOP(11) --> START_B b b b b 1 2 TO_A a a
STOP(11)
10: START_B b b b b 1 TO_A a a STOP(10) --> START_B b b b b 1 TO_A a a
STOP(10)
11: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 6 STOP(12) --> START_B b b b b TO_C 12 34 56
STOP(10)
The first 12 tests I am agree.


12: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 STOP(11) --> START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5
STOP(11)
Here we could make a win if we can convert to:
 START_B b b b b 1 TO_C 23 45 STOP(10)

13: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 STOP(10) --> START_B b b b b TO_C 12 34 STOP(9)
14: START_B b b b b 1 2 3 STOP(9) --> START_B b b b b 1 2 3 STOP(9)
15: START_B b b b b 1 2 STOP(8) --> START_B b b b b 1 2 STOP(8)
16: START_B b b b b 1 STOP(7) --> START_B b b b b 1 STOP(7)
17: START_B ± 1 2 3 4 b STOP(8) --> START_C ± 12 34 TO_B b STOP(7)
18: START_B b TO_A a TO_B ± 1 2 3 4 b STOP(12) --> START_B b TO_A a TO_C ±
12 34 TO_B b STOP(11)
19: START_B b TO_A a TO_B 1 2 STOP(8) --> START_B b TO_A a TO_C 12 STOP(7)
20: START_B b TO_A a TO_B 1 2 3 b STOP(10) --> START_B b TO_A a TO_B 1 2 3
b STOP(10)
21: START_B b TO_A a TO_B 1 2 3 4 b STOP(11) --> START_B b TO_A a TO_C 12
34 TO_B b STOP(10)

So if we could solve testcase 12, I think we have found the solution for
all cases.

Kind regards,

Klaas

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Robin Becker <robin at reportlab.com> wrote:

> Hi Klaas,
>
> for some reason I assumed we always start in b, but perhaps I'm being
> stupid since as you suggest we can immediately switch to C.
>
> I think you are suggesting that in the special case that
>
>       l[startpos-1]=='START_X'
>
> we know that START_X TO_C will be reduced so we can add one to the saving.
>
> I believe a sequence like this
>
> 'START_B b TO_A a TO_B xf1 1 2 3 4 b STOP' (12)
>
> can occur and it is not improved by the current scheme
>
> effectively we seem to ignore the start character entirely.
>
> This should be reduced to
>
> 'START_B b TO_A a TO_C xf1 12 34 TO_B b STOP' (11)
>
> I propose one more complication to try and capture this; we add to savings
> if we start the C sequence right after a start and then combine the start
> and TO_C if that condition works.
>
>
> my new test program looks like this
>
> #######################################################
> from string import digits
> starts = ['START_B','TO_A','TO_B']
> def _trailingDigitsToC(self, l):
>     # Optimization: trailing digits -> set C double-digits
>
>     i = 0
>     nl = []
>     while i < len(l):
>         startpos = i
>         rl = []
>         savings = -1 # the TO_C costs one character
>         while i < len(l):
>             if l[i] in starts:
>                 j = i
>                 break
>             elif l[i] == '\xf1':
>                 rl.append(l[i])
>                 i += 1
>                 continue
>             elif len(l[i]) == 1 and l[i] in digits \
>              and len(l[i+1]) == 1 and l[i+1] in digits:
>                 rl.append(l[i] + l[i+1])
>                 i += 2
>                 savings += 1
>                 continue
>             else:
>                 break
>
>         ta = not (l[i]=='STOP' or j==i)
>         xs = savings>=0 and (startpos and nl[-1] in starts)
>         if savings+int(xs) > int(ta):
>             if xs:
>                 toc = nl[-1][:-1]+'C'
>                 del nl[-1]
>             else:
>                 toc = 'TO_C'
>             nl += [toc]+rl
>             if ta:
>                 nl.append('TO'+l[j][-2:])
>             nl.append(l[i])
>         else:
>             nl += l[startpos:i+1]
>         i += 1
>     return nl
>
> for x,l in enumerate((
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 6 b b b STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 b b b STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 b b b STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 b b b STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 b b b STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 b b b STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 6 TO_A a a STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 TO_A a a STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 TO_A a a STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 TO_A a a STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 TO_A a a STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 6 STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 5 STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 4 STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 3 STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 2 STOP',
>         'START_B b b b b 1 STOP',
>         'START_B \xf1 1 2 3 4 b STOP',
>         'START_B b TO_A a TO_B \xf1 1 2 3 4 b STOP',
>         'START_B b TO_A a TO_B 1 2 STOP',
>         'START_B b TO_A a TO_B 1 2 3 b STOP',
>         'START_B b TO_A a TO_B 1 2 3 4 b STOP',
>         )):
>     l = l.split()
>     lo = _trailingDigitsToC(None, l)
>     print '%2d: %s(%d) --> %s(%d)' % (x,' '.join(l),len(l),'
> '.join(lo),len(lo))
> #######################################################
>
>
> On 05/01/2016 00:13, Klaas Feenstra wrote:
>
>> Robin, I made a little modification and I think this is now working
>> correctly.
>>
>> def _trailingDigitsToC(self, l):
>>          # Optimization: trailing digits -> set C double-digits
>>
>>          i = 0
>>          nl = []
>>          while i < len(l):
>>                  startpos = i
>>                  rl = []
>>                  savings = -1 # the TO_C costs one character
>>                  while i < len(l):
>>                          if l[i] in (['START_B','TO_A','TO_B']):
>>                                  j = i
>>                                  break
>>                          elif l[i] == '\xf1':
>>                                  rl.append(l[i])
>>                                  i += 1
>>                                  continue
>>                          elif len(l[i]) == 1 and l[i] in digits \
>>                           and len(l[i+1]) == 1 and l[i+1] in digits:
>>                                  rl.append(l[i] + l[i+1])
>>                                  i += 2
>>                                  savings += 1
>>                                  continue
>>                          else:
>>                                  break
>>
>>                  ta = not (l[i]=='STOP' or j==i)
>>                  if savings > int(ta) or savings > (startpos-1): #In case
>> of
>> starting with C
>>                          nl += ['TO_C']+rl
>>                          if ta:
>>                                  nl.append('TO'+l[j][-2:])
>>                          nl.append(l[i])
>>                  else:
>>                          nl += l[startpos:i+1]
>>                  i += 1
>>          return nl
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Klaas Feenstra <klaas at feenstra.es>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Robin,
>>>
>>> Yes, your code is working better, but is also not correct. Try the next:
>>> 'START_B xf1 1 2 3 4 b STOP' (8)
>>> should be
>>> 'START_B TO_C xf1 12 34 TO_B b STOP' (8), but in the function encode
>>>
>>>          # Finally, replace START_X,TO_Y with START_Y
>>>          if l[1] in tos:
>>>              l[:2] = ['START_' + l[1][-1]]
>>>
>>> this will be transformed to
>>> 'START_C xf1 12 34 TO_B b STOP' (7)
>>>
>> .........
>
> --
> Robin Becker
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/reportlab-users/attachments/20160111/247fc87f/attachment.html>