[reportlab-users] pyRXP and processing instructions

[Stuart Bishop]

On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 03:29  AM, Robin Becker wrote:

> In article <79957532.1046699769@[192.168.0.2]>, Andreas Jung
> <lists@andreas-jung.com> writes
> ......
>>
>> I think processing instructions should be represented by a new node
>> that makes the PI available for later processing. A callback is not
>> very useful since processing happens after pyRXP would have created
>> the nested tuple representation.
>>
>> Andreas
> well I introduced part of a patch that was contributed by Stuart for
> unicode. That makes processing instructions available as text if you 
> put
> the ReturnProcessingInstructions flag on.

The flag can be set, but it doesn't yet do anything unless you finished
this work :-)

That patch isn't ready for CVS Head yet - it would be happy in a branch
though.

-- 
Stuart Bishop <zen@shangri-la.dropbear.id.au>
http://shangri-la.dropbear.id.au/