[DogParkList] Thank you, MacloggerDX

[Terrence R. Redding, Ph.D.]

Yes, and thanks.

I thought it might be a requirement of the Dxpedition - but see now that it
is needed to separate contacts within MacLoggerDX for better tracking of
countries worked (DXCC IDs).

Yes, very elegant.

Terry - W6LMJ


On 3/1/08 8:27 AM, "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk> wrote:


> I think by now you would have seen Don's reply about how that works - quiet

> an elegant solution I think - if you not sure, come back and I'll elucidate!

> 

> 

> On 01/03/2008 12:50, "Terrence R. Redding, Ph.D." <terry at oltraining.com>

> sent:

> 

>> Hmm,  I went looking for VP6DX-D and found comments on VP6DXD and VP6DX/D -

>> but no explanation as to why the "D" was needed.

>> 

>> Terry - W6LMJ

>> 

>> 

>> On 2/29/08 6:07 PM, "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk> wrote:

>> 

>>> So, picking up that Terrence did not know to do that either - how do we

>>> figure out that sort of thing?

>>> How do I know that certain calls need a 'little bit more'?

>>> 

>>> 

>>> On 29/02/2008 23:05, "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk> sent:

>>> 

>>>> I hadn't realised I needed to do that, so what difference does it make, I

>>>> assume the -D is not included in an ADIF (I've already upload mine to eQSL

>>>> &

>>>> LoTW)

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> On 29/02/2008 22:54, "Don Agro" <dagro at dogparksoftware.com> sent:

>>>> 

>>>>> Don't forget to log VP6DX as "VP6DX-D", for the Ducie Island dxpedition.

>